Legal Opinion

American Surety Co. v. Hoehl

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed May 1, 1923:

Crownhart, J.

The appellant Carchidi was appointed administrator with will annexed of the estate of Christina Hoehl by the county court of Milwaukee county. He made a written application for an official bond of $11,000 to the American Surety Company, in which he represented that the estate consisted of “bonds.” He wrote a letter to Mr. Benjamin Poss, attorney for the estate, directing him to make out the inventory of the property to be filed, and gave *196him in the letter a list of the property in’ his possession belonging to the estate, which included…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koeber v. SomersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Herman v. SchlesingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  3. C. Aultman & Co. v. RitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hoffman v. LabutzkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. ChakourasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Beck v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API