Legal Opinion

American Marble Corp. v. Crawford

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1987No. 8623SC726PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant Crawford (hereinafter defendant) contends that the court erred in entering summary judgment against his claim that plaintiff violated N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-1.1 and that he thus was entitled to treble damages under G.S. § 75-16. We disagree.

Defendant’s counterclaim alleged that the “covenant not to compete, as used by the plaintiff, is an unfair trade practice pursuant to [G.S.] § 75-1.1 et seq.” We have held previously that “employer-employee relationships do not fall within the intended scope of G.S. § 75-1.1 . . . .” Buie v. Daniel International, 56 N.C. App. 445, 289…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Buie v. Daniel International Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Liggett Group, Inc. v. SunasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Kinesis Advertising, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Fisher v. Commc'n Workers of Am.North Carolina Business Court · 2008
  4. Box Co. of Am. v. BostickNorth Carolina Business Court · 2025
  5. Jekson USA, Inc. v. WhiteNorth Carolina Business Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API