American Marble Corp. v. Crawford
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Defendant Crawford (hereinafter defendant) contends that the court erred in entering summary judgment against his claim that plaintiff violated N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-1.1 and that he thus was entitled to treble damages under G.S. § 75-16. We disagree.
Defendant’s counterclaim alleged that the “covenant not to compete, as used by the plaintiff, is an unfair trade practice pursuant to [G.S.] § 75-1.1 et seq.” We have held previously that “employer-employee relationships do not fall within the intended scope of G.S. § 75-1.1 . . . .” Buie v. Daniel International, 56 N.C. App. 445, 289…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Buie v. Daniel International Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Liggett Group, Inc. v. SunasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Kinesis Advertising, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Fisher v. Commc'n Workers of Am.North Carolina Business Court · 2008
- Box Co. of Am. v. BostickNorth Carolina Business Court · 2025
- Jekson USA, Inc. v. WhiteNorth Carolina Business Court · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.