Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1968No. Appeal, No. 38PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

Appellant taxpayer maintains that it is not liable for Sales or Use Tax applied to materials bought for use in constructing the Allegheny Tunnel of the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Taxpayer has appealed from an order of the Board of Finance and Revenue denying taxpayer’s claim for a refund. The court below, on stipulated facts, upheld the determination of the board.

As part of the stipulation, the parties agreed that the materials in question were used by taxpayer in constructing the tunnel, pursuant to a contract with the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission which is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Barnes Laundry Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Commonwealth v. McHughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Commonwealth v. LaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. James Leo Harris, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. In re Thirty-third Statewide Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Ernest Renda Contracting Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Pullman Incorporated v. VolpeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. Erie Excavating & Grading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API