Legal Opinion

Grimke v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 1910PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.

On June 18, 1895, Emmeline Cushing of Boston died, leaving a will containing a residuary clause which bequeaths and devises her property to trustees for the purposes expressed therein, as follows: “I have long entertained a desire of assisting colored people of my country who have been oppressed and down-trodden in the past, and are now unjustly treated, kept back and hindered in the race of life because of a cruel prejudice against them. Ever since my earliest recollection I have been interested in the welfare of colored people, and have felt that they had not had justice done them, and that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weeks v. HobsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Richardson v. MulleryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Attorney General v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Ely v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. Sears v. ChapmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Jones' Unknown Heirs v. DorchesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Norris v. LoomisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Town of Milton v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Ripley v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API