Legal Opinion

Weeks v. Hobson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 1, 1890PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Supplemental " bill in equity, in the. nature of a bill of review, by the trustees of the Haverhill City Hospital, against the trustees under the will of Ezekiel J. M. Hale and the Attorney General. The defendants demurred to the bill for want of equity. Field, J., overruled the demurrer; and the defendants appealed to the full court. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, J.

The will of Ezekiel J. M. Hale, late of Haverhill, deceased, contains the following provision : “ It is my will, and I hereby direct that my executrix and executors and trustees shall convey to the corporation of the Haverhill City Hospital, when established, the lot of land, with the buildings thereon, situated in said Haverhill in the county of Essex and Commonwealth, of Massachusetts, between Kent and Moore Streets, adjoining the land of J. B. Swett arid formerly owned by J. Howard Nichols, together with the sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000)'in money. Said lot of land to be used as a…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Teele v. Bishop of DerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Rogers v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. Village of Hinsdale v. Chicago City Missionary SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  4. City of Boston v. DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Codman v. BrighamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API