Legal Opinion

Stefanic v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1960No. Docket 65, Calendar 47,852PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant in the Washtenaw circuit for malicious prosecution. The case was tried to a jury. Defendant’s motion for directed verdict, assigning no proof of want of probable cause and due reliance on advices of the county prosecutor following disclosure to the prosecutor of all material facts, was reserved for decision. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff and assessed her damages at the sum of $23,000. On defendant’s motion, the trial judge set aside the verdict and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff originally was employed by defendant as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. McMillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Merriam v. Continental Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Prine v. Singer Sewing Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taft v. J L Hudson Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Koski v. VohsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Radzinski v. DoeMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Koski v. VohsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Koski v. VohsMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API