Legal Opinion
Brian M. Urban Co. v. Wenneman (In Re Wenneman)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 19, 1997No. 19-10767PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
RANDOLPH BAXTER, Bankruptcy Judge.
* * J:
This matter came before the court upon cross motions for summary judgment in the above-styled adversary proceeding. These motions arise from the Plaintiffs objection to discharge of a debt. Plaintiff, Brian M. Urban Co., L.P.A. (Urban) represented the Debtor-Defendant Thomas J. Wenneman (the Debtor) in his prior divorce action and is claiming the fees from that representation as nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15). As an action based upon an objection to debt discharge, the cross motions for summary judgment are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In the Matter of Lifschultz Fast Freight Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of Bruce E. De Medici, Trustee for Lifschultz Fast Freight CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Loe, Warren, Rosenfield, Katcher, Hibbs, & Windsor, P.C. v. Brooks (In Re Brooks)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2007
- Law Firm of Morgan v. LeRoy (In Re LeRoy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Gabel v. Olson (In Re Olson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Savage, Herndon & Turner v. Sanders (In Re Sanders)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1999
- Schaefer v. Deppe (In Re Deppe)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.