Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hiatt

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries. After the return of a verdiet for the plaintiff under leave reserved the judge denied, subject to their exception, a motion of the defendants for the entry of a verdict in their favor.

There was evidence that the plaintiff was employed by the defendants, who were husband and wife, in their home in Worcester as a practical nurse to care for their newborn baby. On the morning of July 17, 1946, the plaintiff went to the kitchen to prepare milk for the baby. She there found the defendant Mrs. Hiatt who had been defrosting the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DePrizio v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Walsh v. Riverway Drug Store Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Mallen v. James A. Houston Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Whalen v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mailhot v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Nason v. Boston Garden Arena Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API