Legal Opinion
DePrizio v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 24, 1935PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiff in the first action seeks to recover damages for injuries received by her as the result of a fall while a customer in the defendant’s store. Her husband brought the second action to recover consequential damages. At a trial before a jury there was a verdict for each plaintiff and thereafter the trial judge, who had reserved leave under G. L. c. 231, § 120, on the defendant’s motion, ordered that a verdict be entered for the defendant in each case and reported the cases for the determination of this court. The report states that the only questions presented are whether a written…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Newton v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- White v. MugarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Erickson v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Brown v. Town of WinthropMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Baird v. Baptist SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Foley v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Regan v. Atlantic Refining Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Connair v. J. H. Beattie Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Doherty's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.