Legal Opinion

Lundy v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided June 22, 1989No. 09-88-229 CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Appeal from a jury verdict adverse to John Lundy and his wife. In a juried proceeding the fact-finders returned this verdict:

“SPECIAL ISSUE NO. 3
“Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that the fire in question was intentionally caused by any act, design or procurement on the part of the Plaintiffs?
“Answer: ‘We do’ or ‘We do not.’
“Answer: We do”.

The verdict was unanimous by a vote of all twelve of the jurors.

The Background of the Litigation

The district court litigation was initiated and prosecuted by John and Winona Lun-dy, as plaintiffs, against Allstate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Simmons, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1993
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Vandiver, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  3. First State Bank of Denton, as of the Will of J.T. Mills, Deceased v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Crane, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
  5. Blankenship v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API