Lundy v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKSHIRE, Justice.
Appeal from a jury verdict adverse to John Lundy and his wife. In a juried proceeding the fact-finders returned this verdict:
“SPECIAL ISSUE NO. 3
“Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that the fire in question was intentionally caused by any act, design or procurement on the part of the Plaintiffs?
“Answer: ‘We do’ or ‘We do not.’
“Answer: We do”.
The verdict was unanimous by a vote of all twelve of the jurors.
The Background of the Litigation
The district court litigation was initiated and prosecuted by John and Winona Lun-dy, as plaintiffs, against Allstate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Simmons, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1993
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Vandiver, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
- First State Bank of Denton, as of the Will of J.T. Mills, Deceased v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Crane, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
- Blankenship v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1995