Legal Opinion

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1950No. 32880PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

Special ground 1 of the amended motion for a new trial complains of error in the charge as follows: “Gentlemen, if you find the defendant used such degree of caution and care at the time of the transaction in question that an ordinarily prudent person would have used under the-same or similar circumstances, you would be authorized to find a verdict for the defendant.” As pointed out, the word “authorized” should have been “required.” However, immediately before this sentence the court charged that if the defendant “used such care as an ordinarily cautious and prudent person would use under…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Americus, Preston & Lumpkin Railroad v. LuckieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Georgia Power Company v. BlumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. O'Dowd v. NewnhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Smith v. American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kreiss v. Allatoona Landing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Hester v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Herring v. R. L. Mathis Certified Dairy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Rios v. NorsworthyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. McCray v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API