Legal Opinion

Broerman v. Spilker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1915No. 22,470PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Superior Court of Vanderburgh County; F. M. Hostetter, Judge. Proceeding for the construction of a dram, on the petition of Barbara Spilker and others. From a judgment establishing the drain, J. Rudolph Broerman and others appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

*891 *88. Appeal from a judgment confirming a report of drainage commissioners and establishing a public open *89drain, under the act of 1907. Acts 1907 p. 508, §6141 Burns 1914. Appellants seek, among other things, to present the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the court’s decision. Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, because it affirmatively appears that all the evidence is not in the record. The motion is overruled. Matters not dependent on a consideration of the evidence are presented for review.

2. The proposed drain is called the Spilker ditch. Previous to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Stockton v. PancoastIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Barner v. White Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Moore v. RyanIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. State Ex Rel. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Kirkpatrick v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Wolfe v. GleasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API