Legal Opinion

Stockton v. Pancoast

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1912No. 21,945PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Prom Jasper Circuit Court,- James P. Wason, Judge. Proceeding for the improvement of an established drain brought by Abner C. Pancoast and others, and against which Almira M. Stockton and others remonstrated. Prom a judgment for petitioners, the remonstrants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.

In October, 1909, appellees, as landowners, filed in the Jasper Circuit Court a drainage petition, praying for the tiling, enlarging and improving of a public drain, known as the Martindale ditch, and a lateral thereof called the Halstead ditch, and for the constructing of some new branches to the Martindale ditch. The proposed improvements were all in Jasper county.

It is contended by appellants that the Jasper Circuit Court had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the proceeding.

Appellants Almira M. Stockton, Cordelia M. Williams and Eliza Makeever filed a remonstrance, in the twelfth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Houck v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State ex rel. Warren v. OganIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. O'Toole v. TudorIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Kemp v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shields v. PylesIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Huffman v. NewleeIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Woodring v. McCaslinIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hauschild v. RothIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Williams v. OsborneIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API