Legal Opinion

In re Anderson

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 15, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Peo obedecí o upon the settlement of the account of administratrices.

1Opinion of the Court

Ketcham, S.—

The administratrices having accounted in a proceeding brought since September 1, 1914, and having therein sold real estate of their decedent for the payment of debts, now move that the purchaser in such sale take the title proffered by them.

• The purchaser voluntarily appears in the accounting proceeding and resists this motion upon the ground that one of the heirs-at-law of the decedent has made a mortgage upon all the right, title and interest of the mortgagor in the premises so sold, and that the mortgagee therein named was not served with citation in the proceeding.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Happy v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Rockwell v. . NearingNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Campbell v. . EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Matter of TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Wilson v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cipperly v. LinkNew York Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API