Legal Opinion

Brower v. Goodyer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 9297PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The appellant bought goods of the appellees which they replevied iu this action, proceeding on the theory that the property was obtained from them by fraud.

Property obtained by fraud may be replevied by the seller from the buyer. If, however, the rights of innocent third *573persons have intervened it is otherwise, in cases where the former intended to transfer title by sale. Parrish v. Thurston, 37 Ind. 437.

Where there is evidence tending to show that an insolvent dealer bought goods not intending to pay for them, it is proper to ask him, when on the witness stand, what property he •owned,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. O'Donald v. ConstantIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Bidault v. WalesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  4. Proctor v. DeCampIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Westphal v. HeckmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Mosier v. StollIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Levi v. KraminerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Rose v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  5. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. SargentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API