Legal Opinion

Loyal Union Circle v. Rose

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1926No. 16399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JARMAN, C-

In 1921, Roj Rose made application to the Loyal Union Circle for a certificate of membership and .policj' of insurance and in said application warranted, among other things, that he did not have tuberculosis. Upon the application being filed, the Loyal Union Circle issued a membership certificate and policy of insurance, and designated Britton Rose as the beneficiary. On September 6, 1923, the insured died of tuberculosis, and thereafter this action was.begun by Britton Rose to recover the sum of $675 upon the policy, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keeves & Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Layton v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Mattox v. MattoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Mutual Life & Accident Ass'n v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API