In re Novak
District Court, D. South Dakota
In Bankruptcy. On review' of an order made by Henry A. Muller, Esq., referee in bankruptcy, November 26, 1906, commanding the trustee in the above proceeding to set aside to the copartnership of Novak & Kostel $750 as partnership exemption.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, District Judge.
On the 26th day of November, 1906. Henry A. Muller, Esq., referee in bankruptcy, made an order in the above-entitled matter commanding the trustee therein, Robert F. Riemer, to set apart to the copartnership of Novak & Kcfstel $750 in money as a partnership exemption. The trustee, feeling aggrieved by said order, petitioned the referee to certify the question as to whether said Novak & Kostel were entitled to a copartnership exemption to this court for review. Upon this petition the referee has certified the question.
In' the view the court takes of the matter…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re LentzDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jennings v. William A. Stannus & SonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
- Dixon v. KoplarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- In re AbramsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1912
- In re I. S. Vickerman & Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1912