Jennings v. William A. Stannus & Son
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Petition for Revision of Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington, in Bankruptcy. In the matter of William A. Stannus & Son, bankrupts. Petition by I. H. Jennings, trustee, to revise an order allowing exemptions to William A. Stannus from partnership property. This is a petition for revision of the order and judgment of the District Court made in bankruptcy.
Read the full summary
Petition for Revision of Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington, in Bankruptcy. In the matter of William A. Stannus & Son, bankrupts. Petition by I. H. Jennings, trustee, to revise an order allowing exemptions to William A. Stannus from partnership property. This is a petition for revision of the order and judgment of the District Court made in bankruptcy. It appears from the record that William A. Stannus made and filed a petition in bankruptcy in his own behalf and also in behalf of the copartnership of William…
1Opinion of the CourtWolverton, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). [1] The sole question presented' for our determination is whether the partnership assets of William A. Stannus & Son, to the amount of $250, are exempt from the operation of the bankruptcy proceeding, in lieu of the animals, provisions, and feed to which a householder is entitled under the statutes of Washington as exempt from execution.
The bankrupt is entitled, under the sixth section of the bankruptcy act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 548 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3424), to such exemptions of property as are exempt to the debtor from execution and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pond v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- In re Prince & WalterDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1904
- Gilman v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- Russell v. LennonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Sparman v. . KeimNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Paulson v. McMillanWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Potter v. Florida Motor Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1932
- Dixon v. KoplarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Frost v. County of Santa Barbara (In Re Frost)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1990
- Foot, Schulze & Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.