Legal Opinion

Brookshire Ex Rel. Brookshire v. Retz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 2003No. 25589PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

John and Susan Brookshire (“Plaintiffs”) brought a medical malpractice suit against some of John’s health care providers. 1 This appeal by Plaintiffs is from a judgment, purportedly entered pursuant to Rule 74.01(b), that allowed Snyder Construction (“Snyder”) and its workers’ compensation carrier, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“St.Paul”), to intervene in Plaintiffs’ suit. 2 Because the trial court lacked authority to certify its order as a final judgment under Rule 74.01(b), no final, appealable judgment exists; consequently, this court is without jurisdiction to consider the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Gibson v. BrewerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Professor Harriet Spiegel v. The Trustees of Tufts CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Reser v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ressler v. C.B.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Doss v. Howell-Oregon Electric Cooperative, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Dreppard v. DreppardMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Ideker, Inc. v. GrateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. In Re ABNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API