Legal Opinion

Bigelow v. Halloran

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 11, 1981No. 51784PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order of the trial court denying defendant’s alternative motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. On appeal, defendant argues that Minnesota’s survival statute, Minn.Stat. § 573.01 (1980), is applicable thus extinguishing plaintiff’s cause of action for assault and battery because of the death of the tortfeasor, Ralph Mathias. The trial court held, under our decision in Milkovich v. Saari, 295 Minn. 155, 203 N.W.2d 408 (1973), that Iowa’s survival statute, Iowa Code § 611.20, is applicable thus allowing the survival of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. MacK v. McGrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hataway v. McKinleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Jepson v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Fitts v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Thompson v. Estate of PetroffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Lommen v. City of East Grand ForksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API