Legal Opinion
Beal v. Ross
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided December 23, 1942No. File No. 43399PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action under our bastardy statute. (Gen. Stat. [1930] § 5867, as amd.) The plaintiff, a married woman separated from her husband, alleges that on September 5, 1942, a son was born to her as the result of her cohabitation with the defendant, a married man separated from his wife.
In preliminary proceedings, conducted before a justice of the peace, probable cause to support the plaintiff's claim of pregnancy was found to exist, and the defendant was ordered to appear before the Court of Common Pleas for Fairfield County at its session commencing on the first Tuesday of May, 1942.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Wright v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- In Re the Estate of MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Hubert v. CloutierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schaffer v. SchafferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Estey v. MawdsleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966
- Franklin v. CongelosiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1970