Legal Opinion
Perdeaux v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 5, 2002No. 99 CV 8691 NGPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs,’ 138 field witness security specialists for the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”), bring this action for a writ of mandamus against the United States; George W. Bush, President of the United States; John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General; Louie McKinney, Acting Director of the USMS; and Steven Cohen, Acting Director of the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”). 1 Plaintiffs allege that defendants deprived them of their property in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment by failing to implement the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lipton v. Nature Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Leonard D. Goodisman v. Scott LytleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perdeaux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Perdeaux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003