Legal Opinion

Ford v. Rigidply Rafters, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 1, 1998No. Y-96-1699PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.

I

This Title VII same-sex sexual harassment case is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) or for new trial, and on Plaintiffs motion for attorney fees. The case was tried to a jury in June 1997. Although the jury determined that Rigidply employee Leonard Orendorf did not sexually harass Plaintiff, the jury did find that Rigidply retaliated against Plaintiff, thereby violating Title VII, and that Rigidply was liable for Plaintiff’s termination. The jury also found that Defendants did not retaliate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Makovi v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Town of CheverlyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
  2. Xiao-Yue Gu v. Hughes STX Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
  3. Covington v. Helix Electric, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  4. Heade v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API