Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Blachy v. Butcher

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 21, 2000No. Nos. 99-1185, 99-1492, 99-1523Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSiler, Circuit Judge

I would affirm the decision of the district court in full. Therefore, I concur in most of the conclusions made by the majority opinion, but I dissent from that part of the decision which holds that the district court erred in finding that the constructive trust was retroactive to 1978 and, therefore, was superior to the 1988 tax lien filed by the IRS.

Although, as the majority finds, there is language in cases from this court which would support a determination that the federal tax lien is superior to the interest of constructive trust beneficiaries, those cases arose under entirely different…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Omegas Group, Inc., Debtor. Xl/datacomp, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John R. Wilson, Trustee, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Oxford Organisation, Ltd. v. Peterson (In Re Stotler & Co.)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  3. United States v. Dishman Independent Oil, Inc. Penny Oil Corporation Ronnie Messer Kings Construction Company Corbin Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. CrittendenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1993
  5. Reliance Insurance Co. v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API