Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Crittenden
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 4, 1993No. CV 91-2019-JGD (Tx)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER’S PETITION FOR DISTRIBUTION, DENYING CREDITOR BERCUTT’S REQUEST FOR PAYMENT, AND DENYING DEFENDANT CRITTEN-DEN’S REQUESTS
DAVIES, District Judge.
On February 1, 1993, Permanent Receiver George E. Schulman’s Petition for Instructions Re: Distribution to Creditors and Petition to Limit Notice (“Receiver’s Petition”), Creditor Alan S. Bercutt’s Request for Payment, and Defendant Mark R. Crittenden’s Request for Rule 11 Sanctions came on for hearing before this Court. After reviewing the respective parties’ moving papers and oral arguments, the Court HEREBY GRANTS the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In Re Flight Transportation Corporation Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- In Re North American Coin & Currency, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Calistoga Civic Club v. City of CalistogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blachy v. ButcherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Federal Trade Commission v. Think Achievement Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000
- Federal Trade Commission v. AmeriDebt, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Federal Trade Commission v. CrittendenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.