Legal Opinion

Southern Oil Corp. v. Waggoner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1921No. 3701PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; Robert T. Ervin, Judge. Action at law by R. M. Waggoner against the Southern Oil Corporation. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge.

R. M. Waggoner was the owner of certain oil lands in Wichita county, Tex. He had leased these lands to several lessees on a royalty of one-eighth of the oil produced. The leases, provided that said royalty should be delivered to the credit of lessor in the pipe line to which he may connect his wells. These lessees thereafter made contracts for the delivery of certain quantities of oil to the Southern Oil Corporation (hereinafter styled defendant). The oil so delivered included the one-eighth part of production reserved as a royalty to said lessor, Waggoner. The evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Mexican Central Railway Co. v. DuthieSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Weems & Waldo v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robilio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  2. Nelson & Witt v. Texas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Concrete Steel Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  4. Deupree v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  5. Hines v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API