Legal Opinion

Hull v. Thoms

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 20, 1909PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Pleas in abatement by the plaintiff to appeals taken to this court from the Superior Court in New Haven County, heard upon demurrers to the pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

The appellant in the Superior Court, Levea A. Hull, whom we shall call the plaintiff, presented to the appellees (defendants), administrators of the estate of Joseph W. Kindregan, a claim for about $25,000 for compensation for services, expenses, etc., rendered and incurred by the plaintiff, under an agreement, in the care of said Kindregan and his wife during some nine years prior to May, 1907, the date of death of said Kindregan. From the report of the commissioners upon said claim, the plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court in New Haven county, where, upon the trial of the case to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bulkeley's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  2. Hayden v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Fuller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  4. Stillman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  5. In re Shelton Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1898

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pietrorazio v. SantopietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Kolich v. ShugrueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Jaquith v. RevsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  4. In Re Application of Title Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  5. State v. LindsaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API