Legal Opinion

Kirby v. City of Monroe

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1921No. Docket No. 115PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Monroe; Root (Jesse H.), J. Bill by Charles E. Kirby and another against the city of Monroe and others to enjoin the issuance of certain bonds. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiffs are residents and taxpayers of the city of Monroe. They filed their bill in equity to restrain the city from purchasing the Monroe water works, on the theory that to do so would violate the statutory and charter provisions against incurring indebtedness beyond the legal percentage of the assessed valuation of the property of the city. The case was heard upon stipulation as to the facts involved, there being no disagreement as to them. The chancellor *616refused the relief prayed and the plaintiffs have appealed.

It appears from the stipulation that in pursuance of a special election…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McPherson v. Foster Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Citizens Bank v. City of TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Daviess County v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. State ex rel. Schintgen v. Mayor of La CrosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Stockdale v. School District No. TwoMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shover v. BufordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Rappaport v. Department of Public Health & HospitalsIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Watson v. Livingston, TrusteesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. City Commission v. VedderMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Duane v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API