Legal Opinion

Rothman v. Fillette

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1982No. 93PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellants contend the lower court erred in striking an order to settle, discontinue and end appellee’s personal injury action. Finding no abuse of- discretion, we affirm the order of the lower court.

Appellee, injured in a 1971 automobile accident, brought suit in trespass in 1972. His attorney negotiated with appellants’ insurer, and, in 1974, agreed to a $7000 settlement. The attorney delivered a release, accepted a draft, and filed a praecipe to mark the case settled. Unaware of *31these events and believing his case would eventually go to trial, appellee maintained contact…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Sustrik v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Archbishop v. KARLAKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Nehleber v. AnzaloneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rothman v. FilletteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Manzitti v. AmslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Edwards v. Born, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1985
  4. Manzitti v. AmslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Manzitti v. AmslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API