Rothman v. Fillette
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellants contend the lower court erred in striking an order to settle, discontinue and end appellee’s personal injury action. Finding no abuse of- discretion, we affirm the order of the lower court.
Appellee, injured in a 1971 automobile accident, brought suit in trespass in 1972. His attorney negotiated with appellants’ insurer, and, in 1974, agreed to a $7000 settlement. The attorney delivered a release, accepted a draft, and filed a praecipe to mark the case settled. Unaware of *31these events and believing his case would eventually go to trial, appellee maintained contact…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Shane v. HoffmannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Sustrik v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Archbishop v. KARLAKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Nehleber v. AnzaloneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rothman v. FilletteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Manzitti v. AmslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Edwards v. Born, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1985
- Manzitti v. AmslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Manzitti v. AmslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.