Hallsen v. Seabrook Clam Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The plaintiff, John Hallsen, appeals from the Superior Court’s {Gray, J.) denial of workers’ compensation benefits beyond January 1, 1988. Because the plaintiff did not prove that his physical impairment was caused by a work-related injury, we affirm.
On March 8, 1987, the plaintiff was working for the defendant, Seabrook Clam Company. While he was helping move an 1,800 pound rack, the rack tipped and pinned the plaintiff against a wall. The plaintiff sought treatment for pain in his right knee from Dr. Richard Mindess, an orthopedic surgeon, on March 23,1987. His examination revealed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tzimas v. Coiffures ex rel. MichaelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Knight Broadcasting v. KaneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- F. A. Gray, Inc. v. DemopoulosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Xydias v. Davidson Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989