Legal Opinion

Benson v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 14, 2013No. 11-4202UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRENCE L. O’BRIEN, United States Circuit Judge.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Michael Benson (Benson) appeals from the summary judgment entered for Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company. The judgment upheld Hartford’s denial of benefits under his wife’s life insurance pol icy. Prior to the death of Benson’s wife, Kristy, Hartford’s policy administrator determined she was able to work a sedentary part-time job. As a result, Hartford concluded she was not totally disabled under her policy terms and terminated her life insurance premium waiver (which had been granted due to her total disability). It…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. EUGENE S. v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. Weber v. GE Group Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daniel Demer v. IBM Corp Ltd PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Daniel Demer v. IBM Corp Ltd PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Faleh Salhoub v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API