Legal Opinion
Weiler v. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Inv. Servs., Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 30, 2018No. G053953PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
*973INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Rae Weiler seeks a declaration and order from the superior court that defendants Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services, Inc., et al., must either (1) pay plaintiff's share of the costs in the previously ordered arbitration, or (2) waive their contractual right to arbitrate the underlying claims and allow them to be tried in the superior court. We conclude, based primarily on Roldan v. Callahan & Blaine (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 87, 161 Cal.Rptr.3d 493 ( Roldan ), plaintiff may be entitled to the relief she seeks.
Plaintiff and her husband allegedly lost more…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aronow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Aronow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- CellInfo, LLC v. American Tower CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Hang v. RG Legacy ICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Hubbard v. Alku, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.