Legal Opinion

Pigg v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 2010No. 52A02-0907-CV-666PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OFP THE CASE

Appellant-Petitioner, Steve Pigg (Pigg), appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to compel the delivery of money from his attorney pursuant to Ind.Code § 33-21-1-9 1

We affirm.

ISSUES

Pigg raises two issues for our review, which we restate as:(1) Whether the trial court abused its discretion by not holding an evidentiary hearing; and(2) Whether the trial court erred by denying Pigg's motion to compel the delivery of money.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1991, Pigg pled guilty to the murders of Jason Brown and Nanette Scott, and was sentenced to an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Archem, Inc. v. SimoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Niksich v. CottonIndiana Supreme Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Curtis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. HobbsIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Tharpe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Coltin Drew Herzog v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2026
  5. D.M. v. H.H. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API