Legal Opinion

Agway, Inc. v. Gray

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 21, 1997No. 95-651PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Defendant Keith Gray appeals from a summary judgment of the Orleans Superior Court enforcing a New York judgment in favor of plaintiff Agway, Inc. Gray contends the court erred in ruling that his counterclaims for consequential damages were barred by the New York judgment entered on an arbitration award. We affirm.

Agway, whose principal place of business is in Syracuse, New York, sold to Gray and installed at his farm in Holland, Vermont an automated milking parlor. The two contracts of sale contained identical arbitration clauses providing that:

*315[a]ny controversy or claim relating to this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Edward L. Greenblatt v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Cayuga Harvester, Inc. v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Carl A. Sanders v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. In re the Arbitration between Granite Worsted Mills, Inc. & Aaronson Cowen, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mellin v. Flood Brook Union School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  2. Carlson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. In Re Investigation Into the Existing Rates of Vermont Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. In Re Shelburne Supermarket, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. Stein v. SteinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API