Editorial "El Imparcial, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local No. 901

Mr. Justice Serrano Geyls with whom Mr. Justice Pérez Pimentel and Mr. Justice Blanco Lugo

concur, dissenting.

With due respect to the Court I must dissent from the opinion of the majority. I believe that the findings of fact of the trial judge are amply supported by the evidence and that as a matter of fact as well as of law, the Police furnished to petitioner “the adequate protection” mentioned in Act No. 50 of August 4, 1947 (Sess. Laws, p. 276; 29 L.P.R.A. §§101-109). I likewise disagree with several interpretations of a legal and constitutional order which are stated in *191the opinion,1' but…