Ervin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
on state’s motion for rehearing.
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The facts are stated in the original opinion. Drawing attention to bill .of excepton No. 2, state’s counsel contends that judicial notice of the census returns showing the population of Abilene did not operate for the reason that there was introduced before the court no authentic proof showing the population of that city as contained in the United States census of 1930. It appears from the bill that there was produced before the court a document from which the following is quoted:
“Form 15-116
“DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Bureau of the Census
“F…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Bennett v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Haaren v. MouldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.