Legal Opinion

Harkenrider v. Hochul

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 2022No. 60Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 60 In the Matter of Tim Harkenrider, et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Kathy Hochul, &c., et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Respondents. Craig R. Bucki, for appellant-respondent Heastie. Eric Hecker, for appellant-respondent Stewart-Cousins. Jeffrey W. Lang, for appellants-respondents Hochul et al. Misha Tseytlin, for respondents-appellants. Campaign Legal Center et al.; League of Women Voters; Thomas F. O'Mara, et al.; Jamaal Bowman, et al.,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Society of Plastics Industry, Inc. v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Purcell v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API