Legal Opinion

Koehring Co. v. Nolden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1984No. 83-1804PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, District Judge:

Koehring Company and Koehring Finance Corp. (“Koehring”) appeal a decision of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit which affirmed two orders granting summary judgment by the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel held that the doctrines of mistake and reformation were not available to alter the clear language used in U.C.C. filing statements and affirmed the bankruptcy judge. We concur in the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s assessment and affirm.

This case involves the priorities of liens as they…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Telco Leasing, Inc. v. Transwestern Title Co., D/B/A California Land Title Co. Of MarinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. In the Matter of William Guy Munger, Bankrupt. Ernest J. Pombo v. Jack A. Ulrich, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Thomas v. GoughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. Dolores v. Roberts v. Oren W. Hollandsworth, Grace Hollandsworth, and Idapine Mills, Inc., an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Inman-Poulsen Lumber Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Pacific Trencher & Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API