Legal Opinion

Inman-Poulsen Lumber Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1955No. 13898_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

The respondent Commissioner made a determination of a deficiency in the income taxes of the petitioner, here called the Company, for the calendar year 1944. The portion of the deficiency here in dispute arises out of the Commissioner’s disallowance of a deduction in the amount of $47,368.76 which the Company claimed on account of an alleged debt to it which it asserted became worthless in that year. Petitioner sought a redetermination of the deficiency before the Tax Court on the ground that its deduction was allowable under § 23 (k) of the Internal Revenue Code. 1

The Tax…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Bercaw v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  3. United States v. WaechterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  4. Milton Bradley Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  5. Alexander & Baldwin, Limited v. KanneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Clifford Daugharty v. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden, Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  2. Bishop Collins v. Gerald ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Horne v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  4. Robert J. Cleary, by His Father and Next Friend, Mike Cleary, Sr. v. Indiana Beach, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  5. Chi Sheng Liu v. Ralph H. Holton, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Honolulu, State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API