People v. Keseling
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
The defendant herein was charged in an information filed in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco with the crime of misdemeanor, namely: Practicing dentistry without a license in violation of the provisions of an act of the legislature regulating the practice of dentistry in the state of California (Stats. 1915, p. 698). The defendant pleaded not guilty, waived a trial by jury, and after a trial by the court was adjudged guilty and sentenced to pay the minimum fine provided by the statute, namely: one hundred dollars. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Ex Parte GerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. BarricCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Ex Parte HornefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. BrocklehurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- People v. LombardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- People v. HeusersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.