Russell v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Stephens county on a charge of murder, and was sentenced to life imprisonment in the state penitentiary.
The first contention is that there is no sufficient corroboration of the accomplice who testified as a witness for the state. This assignment requires a brief-summary of the testimony, both of the accomplice ana that in corroboration. In February, 1926, in the nighttime, W. T. Myers and James Buckner were traveling the highway in a- truck about 15 miles east of Duncan. A car containing three men…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ennis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- McRae v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Robbins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gorum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
- Akins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Birch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
- Drennon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.