Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 1928No. A-6319PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Stephens county on a charge of murder, and was sentenced to life imprisonment in the state penitentiary.

The first contention is that there is no sufficient corroboration of the accomplice who testified as a witness for the state. This assignment requires a brief-summary of the testimony, both of the accomplice ana that in corroboration. In February, 1926, in the nighttime, W. T. Myers and James Buckner were traveling the highway in a- truck about 15 miles east of Duncan. A car containing three men…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ennis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. McRae v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Robbins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gorum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Akins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Birch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Drennon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API