Legal Opinion

In re Hackensack Water Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 7, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ANTELL, P.J.A.D.

Appellants herein are the Environmental Defense Fund and Bergen Save the Watershed Action Network, presumably nonprofit organizations organized and functioning to monitor conditions potentially adverse to the environment. They appeal from orders dated January 12, 1990, of the Watershed Property Review Board (hereinafter “Review Board”) and the Board of Public Utilities (hereinafter “BPU”) permitting the Hackensack Water Company (hereinafter “Hackensack”) to divest itself of 287 acres of watershed property. Appellants contend that the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Texter v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Board of Education v. Board of EducationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  2. City of Newark v. Township of HardystonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API