Legal Opinion

City of Newark v. Township of Hardyston

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 13, 1995PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LONG, P.J.AD.

The primary issue presented on this appeal is whether a provision of the Watershed Protection Act (L. 1988, c. 163 as amended by L. 1990, c. 19) which places limitations on the conveyance of watershed property continues to be valid. We have concluded that the moratorium is still in effect and is a factor to be considered in valuing watershed land for tax purposes.

/

The case arose out of the filing of four real property tax appeals by the City of Newark that contested the assessment of Newark’s watershed property in the Township of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nieder v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. Town Tobacconist v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Jersey City Chapter of Property Owner's Protective Ass'n v. City Council of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. State v. LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Jamouneau v. HarnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Singer v. Township of PrincetonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  2. State v. Simon Family Enterprises, L.L.C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  3. City of Jersey City v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997
  4. 3085 Kennedy Realty Co. v. Tax AssessorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  5. City of Newark v. Township of HardystonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API