David Allen Mann v. James Adams, and Bruce Babbitt, Governor of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
In his petition for rehearing, Mann contends that the unpublished administrative policy statements of the Arizona Department of Corrections in establishing a grievance procedure created a protected liberty interest.
The Supreme Court has held that “a State creates a protected liberty by placing substantive limitations on official discretion.” Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 249, 103 S.Ct. 1741, 1747, 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1983). The Supreme Court has also held that to obtain a protectable right an individual must have “a legitimate claim of entitlement to it.” Greenholtz v. Inmates of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shango v. JurichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Azeez v. DeRobertisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by754 opinions
- Michael C. Antonelli v. Michael F. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- David Adams v. Nathan A. Rice Gary T. Dixon Hazel W. KeithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Cion Peralta v. T. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Bingham v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Ramirez v. GalazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
749 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.