Legal Opinion

SFI Ltd. Partnership 8 v. Carroll

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2014No. S-13-192Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 698 288 NEBRASKA REPORTS the appellees had financing in place and had expressed their ability and willingness to perform under the contract. In the face of Benson’s repudiation, the appellees were not required to tender the money due under the Purchase Agreement. Such would have been a useless act. The district court deter- mined that the appellees’ efforts were sufficient and that thus, Benson was in breach at the time for performance. Based on the applicable law and the district court’s findings, which are supported by the record, we see no error. We find no merit to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Leonard Harbeson, Jean Harbeson v. Parke Davis, Inc., and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Myers v. Nebraska Investment CouncilNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Bedrosky v. HinerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Weeder v. Central Community CollegeNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API