Legal Opinion

Boyd v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1913No. 2747PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

From a conviction of false imprisonment appellant prosecutes this appeal.

The term of the County Court at which this trial occurred adjourned for theterm May 31, 1913. The court at that time entered an order allowing thirty days thereafter to file a statement of facts and bills of exception. Within that thirty days he attempted to extend the time for another thirty days. What purports to be a statement of facts and bills of exceptions were not filed in the lower court until on the sixtieth day after the court adjourned for the term, The Assistant Attorney-General…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Durham and Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API