Legal Opinion

Durham and Harris v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1913No. 2254PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellants were jointly charged, tried and convicted of fornication and each fined $50.

The term of court at which they were tried convened August 6, 1912, • and adjourned October 5, 1912. There is no order of the court below authorizing .the filing of the statement of facts or bills of exceptions after the adjournment of court. What appears to be a statement of facts and bills of exceptions were filed herein on October 18,1912, some fifteen days after the adjournment of the court.

The Assistant Attorney-General has made a motion to strike out the statement of facts and bills…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Schapiro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API