Legal Opinion
United States v. Dorvil
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided October 28, 1991No. 91-0035-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DISPUTED SENTENCING ISSUES
ATKINS, District Judge.
Defendants Jocelyn Dorvil, Majeur Eti-enne, Georges Jean and Franckel Clotaire (collectively “defendants”), who were convicted following a jury trial of various offenses relating to their possession and importation of cocaine into the United States, are now before the court for sentencing. Upon consideration of the evidence and the governing sentencing guidelines, the court determines the following: first, defendants are entitled to a four-level reduction for their minimal roles in the offenses, see Guidelines § 3B1.2(a) (West 1991);…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Oscar Smith, Regina Smith and Gary King, Julia ThomCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Garcia, Victor Monsalve, Palacio, Appeal of Victor MonsalveCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ruben F. SasnettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. RestrepoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Henry FayetteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Ben Renfro StuartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. MirandaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- United States v. Pedro Luis De La Rosa-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Sergio Rene Dominguez ChaconCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007