Legal Opinion

Garrison v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 13, 1935No. 6 Div. 719PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The answer of the garnishee is somewhat confusing as to an indebtedness to the defendant, C. W. Greer. It sets up a joint deposit by Greer and his wife with the authority to either one to draw on the deposit. The answer also has the following recital: “Garnishee further says that it has been notified that Mrs. Charles W. Greer claims title to or an interest in the said deposit of money, reference to which is set forth above, and suggests the said Mrs. Charles W. Greer as a claimant of said funds.”

The clerk, acting upon the above-quoted clause, issued on July 26, 1934,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. BordwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Stair v. York National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  3. In Re the Accounting of BarefieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Gladden v. Columbiana Sav. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Garrison v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API