Legal Opinion
Sampson v. City of Schenectady
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided August 16, 2001No. 1:99-cv-01331PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM — DECISION AND ORDER
KAHN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment as to defendant Siler’s and Barnett’s liability to him for various violations of federal and state law. For the following reasons Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
At approximately 8:00 p.m. on the night of July 28, 1999, defendants Barnett and Siler (the “Officers”) witnessed Plaintiff and another male walking eastbound on Lincoln Avenue in the Hamilton Hill area of Schenectady. Because the Officers had previous drug…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Taravella v. Town of WolcottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Henry v. PurnellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Adelphia Communications Corp. v. Rigas (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Pappas v. New Haven Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Alvarez v. PetersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.